Follow Us

  • LinkedIn Social Icon
  • Facebook Social Icon
  • Twitter Social Icon

What the New York Times Neglected to See


Originally published in the Huffington Post

Guest Contributor Chase J. Johnson


As a Black American therapist who serves clients that practice polyamory, and as someone who practices polyamory myself, I looked forward to the publication of the NY Times article, “Is an open marriage a happier marriage?” There is a common contrived narrative about consensual nonmonogamy that is pervasive in mass media representations, but I had high hopes that the NY Times article would disrupt the trend. I knew several colleagues and friends who do not fit the typical mold were interviewed for it.


When I read the New York Times article, I instead discovered that the author presented a pigeonholed, whitewashed, homogenous experience as the whole of polyamory. One of the things that I know to be true is that pigeonholing or dictating people’s experience is a disservice to the people in any community.  Within the professional and personal communities I belong to, there has been much discussion about these simplifications of polyamory. When I refer to whitewashing, what I mean is that the representation of what is the norm for polyamory is 30-somethings, affluent, white, thin, triad. Most often two women and one guy. When I opened the article, I saw one picture of a black heterosexual couple. As I scrolled down, that’s all that was black, brown, and different. That’s as much of a deviation that we got. That is one degree of variation.

Go Here to Read Article



Please reload

Featured Posts

What the New York Times Neglected to See

May 17, 2017

Please reload

Recent Posts
Please reload